Controversy Over Secure CommunitiesBy Daniel Denvir During the five-month period from Secure Communities has become controversial throughout the country, and a number of localities have asked to withdraw from the program. Earlier this month, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signed legislation to pull out. Whether not the program is voluntary, however, remains unclear. ICE had previously said that the agreement with states was optional, but now says that it is mandatory. "Secure Communities is not voluntary and never has been," Ort told Metropolis. "As we have noted before, unfortunately, this was not communicated as clearly as it should have been to state and local jurisdictions by ICE when the program began. We have taken several specific steps to address this issue. Through outreach with local jurisdictions and members of Congress, we have since made the parameters of the program clear to all stakeholders involved." Liberal members of Congress, including the Hispanic Caucus, have harshly criticized ICE for misleading elected officials and the public. Recently, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has conceded that a communication breakdown had taken place. "The The ICE focus on criminals is a shift from previous enforcement efforts. Under President Bush, ICE focused resources on high-profile workplace immigration raids, such as a July 2008 nation-wide action targeting President Obama shifted course, to focus on the deportation of the most dangerous criminal aliens. However, ICE's own data calls into question whether it is only serious criminals who are targeted. Until recently, there's been little public discussion about the Obama initiatives, which puts the President in an awkward political position in the lead up to the 2012 presidential campaign. The right does not give Obama credit for his heightened deportation campaign, while the Latino community is increasingly angry over it. |
|||
